Skip to content

Fuck Politeness

This is a revolution, not a public relations movement

OK SERIOUS TRIGGER WARNINGS BELOW:

Ok, so now these teenaged boys have admitted it. They did in fact rape this girl, in many different ways. Orally, vaginally, standing around watching, raping her until she bled. Oh, THEY won’t call it rape. No…they just…MADE her ‘have sex’ with them. Well – having sex sounds rather active, doesn’t it. They forced themselves inside her til they ejaculated. HEY: Newsflash, Hairdo, it’s not all about you – THAT AIN’T SEX YOU STUPID ARROGANT MISOGYNIST SELF INDULGENT PRICKS.

No…not RAPE!! They just told her to smile like she enjoyed it while they watched each other ‘fuck her’ til she bled. They just filmed it and called her a slut.

Seven teenage boys raping a girl.

Oh DO let’s hear what the lawyer has to say:

Well ONE boys parents forbade him to be taught about sex education

AND??? It’s the parents fault? Rape is SEX-ED for boys? Girls are sex-ed TOOLS now, like those banana-condom practising thingos? What EXACTLY are you saying?

And, says the lawyer, well, it’s not like it was planned!! (Really? They all just were lurking by the dunnies waiting for a girl who thought she was hanging out with one guy because they would like to have a nice game of HOPSCOTCH and a packet of Twisties??? They didn’t DISCUSS it??? They just each were as taken by surprise as the others, but went ‘Oh, YEAH, now you mention it, rape DOES sound like a spot o fun?’ AND do you think it makes the slightest bit of difference to HER that it was spontaneous gang rape/humiliation/victim-blaming and not planned? DO YOU REALLY?? Is she *less* raped?)

I would ALSO like to ask – when the ADULT COUNCIL WORKERS interupted, WHY did they not ask some fucking QUESTIONS? WHY did their interuption not spell the end of these matters? Why did they not protect this girl? WHY did they just wander off again?

And hey, SMH, the boys did not commit ‘sex acts’ with the girl, they committed RAPE. Many times, in many ways, for the sake of humiliation and shaming.

And this sentence:

The girl had vaginal and oral sex in several different Sydney locations with the boys in acts that one teenager taped on his mobile phone and later sent to his friends.

Well no, actually. She did not. I have HAD ‘vaginal and oral sex’ many times thankyou and find it to be most enjoyable – what *she* “had” was an inability to leave, subjection to ritual humiliation and gang rape, by seven rapists. Planned or unplanned, you’re all rapists now. Seven arsehole teenaged rapists all thinking they had the right to degrade a young girl like that for their own kicks. If you rape, you are a rapist, if you were raped, you were RAPED you did NOT have sex – could we just get that terminology straight please?



Advertisements

%d bloggers like this: