December 16, 2008 Sam Brett sickens me
Sam Brett is so FULL of bullshit contradictions. Let’s sample just a few shall we? Let’s call it the degustation approach.
A wise friend once exclaimed that a woman’s emotions become a man’s burden. When she says those three magic words – the ones that contain eight letters, three syllables and enough baggage to weigh down a 747 – and he’s not ready to hear them, a man can suddenly feel as if he’s been trapped inside a velvet prison. Especially if she’s lying on top of him, butt naked.
Just a warning. If you EVER use the phrase velvet prison in front of me I will wholeheartedly barf on your shoes. If you write it and I read it, I will barf on my own and mail them to you.
Oh yeah, then there’s the whole boring, overdone blah blah, women always say/think I love you “too early”, blah, “I love you from a woman=baggage not actual love” (because women can never be straightforward)…blah blah, if you say it ‘when he’s not ready to hear it’ you’ve done wrong/committed a relationship sin/he’ll run a mile (because women are ALWAYS at that point before men, because men are emotional cripples, because men’s “readiness”, men’s timing, men’s comfort is the ONLY readiness/timing/comfort that counts. If he says it and you’re not ready…well Sam can’t comprehend this notion, I think her head would explode…can we try it?).
[More fake ‘Only in the world of Sam’ conversations]
“Women always try and put things into boxes,” explained a male dating expert when I asked his opinion. “They’re always trying to define things way too early when it sounds like this woman has only just met this man. If she even so much as mentions the ‘L’ word, he’ll run the other way. He’s only thinking about getting laid. Not having her babies. Ever.”
Ah, yes. Thankyou Male Dating Expert. Because:
sex=totally meaningless, devoid of emotion, just about the orgasm=masculine desire=all men everywhere are the same
Anything ‘more’ than “meaningless” sex automatically equals BABIESBABIESBABIES. Women don’t have lives/careers/desires beyond OH BAAAAAAABEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEESS!!!!! SO CUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUTE!!! (We don’t likes sex, we just wants to make teh BAAAAAAAABEEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSS)
And of course babies=meaningful=EVERY WOMAN’S DESIRE IN HER HEART OF HEARTS WHETHER SHE KNOWS IT OR NOT.
Cos (they’re telling us) that all men SEE women as tits and vag on legs, but all men KNOW they’re walking talking uteri just ACHIN’ (yup yup) for some reproduction (yup yup).
Because women never want just sex (and when they do they’re sluts and we should punish them for being man eaters).
Women want LOVE and BABIES and MARRIAGE and FOREVER…they want your SOUL!!!
And men NEVER want companionship/friendship/laughter with a woman, men can never conceive of the woman they want to shag as a whole woman, men NEVER see women as women, in the logic of Sam they seem them as holes to jerk off into.
Sounds familiar? That’s because scientists reckon this irrational female response to sex isn’t exactly her fault. Instead it’s the fault of the female limbic system, which, after sex, or flirtation, or even a text message with one x too many, releases a bunch of irrational hormones leading to the belief that she’s met her soul mate. Even if he’s only after some late-night nooky
Which scientists? Which hormones? What limbic system? What papers? What evidence? What the fuck are you talking about you dipshit?
Here we cross into the section on “Invitation to sex”. Now…you and I move in the world where men and women do actually manage to have discussions (hell, in our world men and men do and women and women, but you know, we’re dealing with SamLand here) but in the land the Dating Experts ‘study’:
Which brings me to the moment two people first lay eyes on each other. You see, men abhor rejection. They’re unable to make the first move without a clear signal from the opposite sex. Hence scientists have come up with the top ways to tell if a woman is into a man and it’s mostly through her sexual body language.
A woman will show a man she’s into him through a range of physical cues: by licking her
lips, touching her lips, putting on lip gloss or pretty much doing anything that may require her mouth, such as sucking seductively on a straw or eating her food playfully. More subtly, she’ll cross and uncross her legs, play with her hair and make lingering eye contact. But don’t take her smile for an indication she wants to sleep with you. Oh no, that’s strictly the male’s domain.
So her sexual body language as studied by “scientists” (ahem) show that she wants you real bad when she does all this.. (lending scientific credibility to the notion that women might say one thing and mean another borders awfully close to propping up rape logic). Again, WHAT science, which scientists, what study. But going against the ‘science’ she just used to back herself up to prove that a woman doing these things wants teh seks; Sam surmises that she doesn’t want teh seks.
Now read THIS:
Dudes, on the other hand, will frequently smile, talk to a woman while looking at her eyes and face (if he actually focuses on what she’s saying, then it’s a telltale sign he’s into her), while any form of touching, asking for her number or calling her the next day are signs he not only wants to sleep with her, but he might actually be interested in getting to know her first.
But HUH??? Men NEVER want anything beyond “just sex”, and WOMEN mess things up by being interested in men as people!!! That’s the LAW, it’s SCIENCE!!!
Again, that lovely false dichotomy (because she likes to pretend she’s hip to the Man-logic but she’s actually a fucking prude): if it’s in any way ‘real’ sex must wait, if sex happens too soon, it’s meaningless, *just* orgasms, the woman will make a fool of herself and the man will go cold. By this stage I’m crosseyed at her ‘logic’.
Blokes can forget those poignant opening pick-up lines they so habitually practise, because it’s the first kiss that says everything to a woman. From the very first snog, men need to beware: women are judging a man by his genetic compatibility. Yep, according to psychologist Professor Gordon Gallup at The State University of New York, Albany, women are searching for olfactory, chemical and tactile cues from the very first kiss in order to “make a determination about instances of potential genetic incompatibility”.
Damn straight the first kiss is important…but that’s cause I want to know how we kiss together. I want to know if it makes me reel with dizzy anticipation, if it makes me grab that person and pull them to me, or if I go…’Ewww….that was wierd’. It’s only happened twice in my life, but it was distinctly…not happening. But “GENETIC INCOMPATIBILITY”????
I want to know if the kiss will light my fire, I want to know the effect my kiss is having. And that is ALL. If I am not intending to breed again then WTF is with genetics? And compatibility? Well call me old fashioned, but I’d rather determine that sort of shit by years of jokes, discussions and laughter…that’s the only way I can think of TO discover it…and WHY is she making the AIM and measure of all things, the LONGTERMNESS? Can ye not be compatible for a six week fling?
Nope, grunt, grunt, it’s all evopsych bullshit here.
Sounds a little complex to me since men, on the other hand, can actually forego the first kiss altogether and instead head straight to the sex part. Or, if they have to engage in a pre-sex snog-fest, may do it only as a “means to an end”, Professor Gallup says. “Males tend to kiss as a way of trying to gain sexual favours, and also to attempt reconciliation.”
AAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHH!
Ok, WOMEN are allowed to like sex, and MEN are allowed to like kissing.
What about all those wonderful hours spent smooching in adolescence? Were the boys who kissed me for hours deficient/not real boys? Would they have grown out of this now? What the fuck is with this wierd hardline delineation between sex and kissing? And wow…men are all manipulative, and are so unmoved/left cold by kissing that they only deploy it as a tactic of manipulation? WHAT. THE. FUCK.
After sex, a man’s dopamine levels drop dramatically, making the woman he’s just bonked less attractive, less desirable and with a less of a chance that he’s going to call her in the morning.
Well, for thos of us without your dazzling familiarity with science Sam, could you perchance include links? To this proven scientific FACT? To hard evidence that dopamine means waking up and being revolted by the chick you banged? That men are all just hormonal dupes?
If men are all hormonal dupes, then why is it that women are painted as irrational for being influenced by THEIR hormones? If we’re equally slaves to our genes/hormones, then perhaps Sam has it all backwards? And MEN are the ones fucking everything up? OR we could all be capable of being fully functional humans??? Influenced by hormones and other factors, but not utterly at the mercy of them?
I just really hate this woman and her writing, the disgusting dismissal of women as rational beings, the revolting reduction of men to total animal status. The reduction of all human sexual interactions to the guy gets his rocks off and just wants the chick to ‘shut up’ now she’s done her job. It’s sickening
Tags: de wimminz and de menz, evopsych CRAP, GOD this crap is tedious, Sam Brett, Sam in the City, SMH
- 14 comments
- Posted under Uncategorized
Permalink #
megpie71
said
Maybe in *her* world, that’s what happens. After all, it can’t be easy being blonde and beautiful, and looking exactly like what the male population have been told to desire from day one. Possibly that’s her experience of the world – men just want her for sex, and if she’s after intimacy, she’s not able to get it because they’ve already moved on to the next conquest. Meanwhile, out here on the other side of the reality gap, there are people who have relationships based on weird stuff like mutual compatibility, shared hobbies, being madly horny for each other, a shared decision not to have kids or whatever.
Of course, Occam’s Razor does point to the more likely answer being that she’s full of shit.
Permalink # So, what’s bugging you today? said
[…] has a great post up about how Sam Brett is bugging her. I couldn’t agree […]
Permalink #
hellonhairylegs
said
“What the fuck are you talking about you dipshit?”
Funny ’cause it needed saying.
Permalink #
bluestherapy
said
You know what? I loved being told I was loved, and I love kissing and snuggling as much (if not more) than sex.
I’m sick of being told what men are supposed to think, especially by dumb fucks like Sam Brett.
Permalink #
audreydarling
said
She’s clearly irrational, perhaps it’s her hormones 😉
I just read Susan Maushart’s Wifework and I distinctly remember reading about a study that showed men want to marry more than women do, probably because there are significant benefits to men (not women) being coupled. I have no idea why men would have any reluctance to marry, or have babies, it all benefits dudes.
Permalink #
librarytart
said
I used to post there under another name but got jack shit angry at the generalisations, stupid words like ‘manbro’ and setting the feminist movement back at the speed of a baked bean fart.
In the last fortnight she wrote something about porn from memory and quoted feminist ‘Erica Long’. My complaint that Ron Jeremy’s name could be spelled correctly but Erica Jong’s couldn’t was never published *sigh*.
Permalink #
fuckpoliteness
said
Oh yeah, I posted on that porn ‘article’. I was so fired up by her “Men, men, I must be subservient to men at all times” crap that I missed the Long/Jong thing
Permalink #
fuckpoliteness
said
Well yeah AD…you do gotta wonder why they keep proposing…you want the freewheeling life? What’s holding you back? Oh…it appears you’re full of shit, you want to have your cake and shit all over it too! (Um, that was a little soliloquoy regarding teh menz whinging about the evil institution of marriage, not directed at one of my commentors, just so we’re clear)
Permalink #
Linda Radfem
said
“I have no idea why men would have any reluctance to marry, or have babies, it all benefits dudes.”
That’s it. It does benefit them. They live longer and have better health than single guys, but patriarchal logic dictates that marriage still be depicted as what She wants. So we feel like they’re doing us this huge favour by marrying us when really, the opposite is the truth.
Permalink #
bluestherapy
said
Sorry, I must have missed this bit before
GET FUCKED!!!! What the hell is she talking about? After sex is one of the truly great experiences. Lying together post coitus is a time partners are at their closest in my opinion.
I think that the ‘science’ that is being quoted in this article, is the sort that’s practiced by those guys in the white coats that appear in shampoo commercials.
Permalink #
Rachel
said
*gibbers incoherently*
It’s all so… WRONG!!!
Permalink #
fuckpoliteness
said
It is really wrong, and really dangerous. This shit gets read and it gets accepted. And men are pegged by it in bad ways and women are pegged by it in bad ways (and responsible for everything, including men’s frustrations and hostilities) and she backs it all up with claims to ‘science’…I just really hate it. It feels like she’s binding us all back up in these myths of ‘how things are’, how men ‘are’, how women ‘are’, the sorts of bullshit myths that we’ve accepted as a society and that have FUCKED US ALL UP!
Permalink #
bluestherapy
said
*taps foot impatiently waiting for new post*
Permalink #
fuckpoliteness
said
Yeah I know, I’ve been a slacker.