Just in case anyone forgot:
June 15, 2009
A man’s review of Steel Magnolias the stage play.
Men: Women, their lives, their friendships and dramas? You are meant to find them utterly boring and irrelevant. You can go along to watch just so you have something to complain about later, and insinuate you’re *pussy whipped* and chicks run the world and own your balls, but no way is is possible that women have anything to say that might be worth listening to, nor is there any way in which you should ever attempt to watch a film about women’s lives without approaching it as though it were root canal work.
Women on the other hand should eagerly anticipate the release of the next dull and repetitive Dude-bro film about the wonders of male friendship and the humour to be found in emotional fuck-wit-ism and anything involving car chases and large scale explosions (cos apparently all men at some stage in their lives will be in a Die Hard kind of scenario).
Learn it and learn it early kids: women need to learn to identify with men and male narratives and the male perspective, else they’re locked out of the majority of cultural works, men on the other hand need desperately to ensure they *never* identify with the female perspective else their *man parts* will shrivel up and fall off and they’ll never again have the respect due to them as a MAN. Chicks can be fully expected to watch dick flicks with the menfolk, but menfolk must never ever be expected to watch a chickflick with the womenfolk.
That review gave me a migraine, but your use of the word “dickflick” made me laugh.
[...] Just in case anyone forgot: [...]
I just read a similar review of a feminist novel “The Carhullan Army” written by some male knob. I’m looking for a suitable book for an online reading club I participate in and I wanted some feminist analysis of it seeing as I haven’t read it myself.
I found a review by some guy from The Guardian and he had *exactly* the same attitude; it’s women’s shit, therefore it is by default insignificant and he should never have been forced to degrade himself by reading it.
Jason Blake is a disgrace of a theatre critic. Sloppy writer, never engages with the context or intentions of what he’s watching, and much more interested in his own writing than in communicating something about what he saw. I’ve thought of writing to the SMH to ask why, among all the English and Theatre Studies and Journalism graduates there are out there, they can’t find someone with a better grasp of the job. This might just be the prompt I need to actually do it.
I can’t bring myself to read the review, but I, too, love the use of the word “dickflick”.
Nice summary of this double standard, however, I do think men allow themselves to watch chick flicks/rom coms if there is one of those terrible, totally ridiculous scenes where women playfight their friends while wearing nothing but their underwear, provided the chicks are only talking about men and/or giggling profusely.
Dick flick! Thank you.
Thankyou so much for that term! Next time I see a trailer for a dickflick, I’m going to say to whoever I am with ‘oh no, how boring, not another DICKFLICK’ as loudly as I can.
Dickflick, what a perfect description.
It will become part of this household’s vocab. My husband calls them ‘Jim Boom’ movies, but dickflick it pithier and to the point.
dickflick. Can’t wait to embarrass the teenagers with that one.
my 4 yr old daughter’s dad refers to any film with a old guy/young woman romantic pairing as an ‘old fucker fantasy’. He says he’d hate for her to think that it was normal for a young woman to be happy about being pursued by a guy the same age as him.
*adds “dickflick” to media vocabulary*
*starts to cook many servings of kudos with maple syrup*
Nom nom nom (eats multiple syrupy kudos). It does get tedious.
Wait…the *attitude* behind the chickflick/dickflick double standards gets tedious. Not the eating of syrupy kudos – never!!
Well I’m glad to hear that ‘dickflick’ is catching on!
Yeah Orlando, that was my beef with the review, it was fuck all to do with the production for the most part, and more him doing a ‘boom, tish’ stand-up routine of ‘Women! Amirite?’
Dickflick! Why did I never think of this?!
And that review was weird, and also pretty pointless, since I learned sod all about the play or why I might *want* to go to see it.
Captain Subtext says: this man is very, very invested in his career as a Big Manly Man Man Who Likes Manly Things, Despite His Interest In The Theatre, Honest.